The Payer Playbook for 2026: Top 6 Digital Transformation Trends

Cheryl Gibson

Tightening regulatory mandates. Sustained margin compression. Adoption of artificial intelligence. These forces (along with many others) serve as a driving force for health insurance payers in the operation landscape.

Regulatory deadlines will accelerate enforcement, leaving limited tolerance for legacy processes and manual workarounds. At the same time, rising medical costs and administrative overhead continue to erode profitability, forcing payers to operate with greater efficiency and precision.

And in 2026, AI is moving from pilot programs to core infrastructure, redefining how payers manage claims, member engagement, risk adjustment, and compliance. To remain competitive and compliant, payers must move beyond incremental improvements and commit to fundamental modernization across technology, data, and operating models.

With that said, here are the 6 digital transformation trends for payers in 2026.

1. Expect a shift to autonomous operations with agentic AI

The industry transition is inevitable, and it has to go beyond simplistic, rule-based automations. Payers are going to need to start pivoting toward agentic AI, which are systems capable of executing coordinated, multi-step workflows with minimal human oversight. Nearly half of insurers are actively testing or deploying agentic AI for core functions such as risk assessment, customer engagement, and compliance decisions, indicating a shift from isolated pilots to broader operational roles.

Scaling agentic AI from pilot to production

AI adoption in insurance has moved past early experimentation. Generative AI capabilities are now part of mainstream investment strategies, with a significant majority of insurers incorporating GenAI tools in at least one business function. However, full enterprise scale remains an emerging opportunity. While about 76% of insurance firms report GenAI implementation, only about 10 % have reached scaled deployment in any discrete function.

Administrative elimination through AI-driven process autonomy

The goal is to maximize ROI with this emerging AI technology. When it’s set up correctly, AI is delivering measurable reductions in administrative burden across high-volume workflows:

AI-enabled claims processing can cut adjudication times by up to 60–70%, shrinking weeks of manual review into hours or even minutes and materially improving throughput and accuracy.
In health insurance specifically, AI integration has reduced operational errors by 22% and prior authorization approval times by 60%.
Industry data suggests that AI can automate 50% or more of routine claims handling and customer interactions, positioning these systems to take on the majority of repetitive, rule-based tasks with minimal human intervention.

Scaling AI beyond narrow departmental use will require redesigning processes to enable true autonomy. Payers will be moving from human-supervised bots to systems capable of end-to-end execution across claims, service, and authorization workflows.

AI governance is part of the process

As operational autonomy expands, regulatory and ethical risk will as well. Recent advocacy and regulatory scrutiny underscore the necessity of robust AI governance frameworks to manage bias, transparency, and compliance. Civil rights and industry groups are pushing for equity-centered standards and bias auditing mechanisms to ensure AI does not embed or exacerbate existing disparities.

Payers must invest in governance infrastructure that includes model validation, bias detection, explainability protocols, and oversight mechanisms that align with evolving regulatory expectations. This is not optional; it’s a foundational requirement for deploying AI at scale without exposing the business to legal, ethical, and reputational risk.

2. Be prepared for stricter compliance regulations

CMS’s Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (CMS-0057-F) makes prior authorization modernization a regulatory imperative starting in 2026. Are payers ready for this change? It will fundamentally reshape how payers operate. Impacted payers are required to replace manual, fragmented PA workflows with FHIR-based APIs that enable electronic, system-to-system prior authorization requests and responses directly between payer platforms and provider EHRs. This effectively eliminates fax- and portal-driven processes and forces payers to adopt API-centric architectures capable of real-time interoperability.

The rule also enforces strict decision turnaround times (72 hours for expedited requests and 7 calendar days for standard requests) and mandates that payers provide clear, specific denial reasons with every decision. These service-level requirements exceed what legacy, human-centric workflows can reliably deliver at scale, accelerating the adoption of AI-driven decision support to pre-validate documentation, assess clinical criteria, and route only true exceptions to human review.

CMS will also introduce public transparency requirements beginning in 2026, requiring payers to publish detailed prior authorization metrics, including approval and denial rates. This shifts PA performance from an internal operational measure to a publicly visible accountability metric, increasing regulatory, provider, and member scrutiny. As a result, prior authorization is no longer just a compliance exercise—it becomes a reputational and competitive differentiator, forcing payers to modernize workflows, data pipelines, and governance models end to end.

Because of all these CMS mandates, payers are racing to digitize one of healthcare's biggest pain points. So to summarize, here’s what payers can expect in the near future:

API Mandates: Payers must support FHIR-based APIs to enable seamless, electronic prior authorization requests and responses between their systems and provider EHRs.
Faster Decisions: The new rules mandate strict decision turnarounds (i.e., 72 hours for urgent requests) and require payers to provide specific denial reasons, driving AI adoption for real-time assessments.
Public Transparency: Payers will be required to publicly report detailed PA metrics (like approval and denial rates), forcing greater operational accountability.

3. Legacy systems are out the door

Legacy IT environments have crossed the threshold from technical inconvenience to material business risk. Monolithic core systems (particularly in claims, enrollment, and billing) were not designed for real-time data access, API-driven interoperability, or AI-native workloads. That’s just the reality of it. As a result, these outdated systems create latency, data fragmentation, and operational rigidity that directly inhibit AI adoption and regulatory responsiveness.

A cloud-native foundation is the prerequisite for progress, which is going to be a big challenge for many payers in 2026. But it wouldn’t be necessary if it wasn’t worth it! Migrating core payer systems to cloud architectures enables elastic scale, continuous deployment, and real-time analytics—capabilities that AI models depend on to operate effectively in production.

Cloud platforms also allow payers to decouple data from applications, centralize it for organizational use, and support high-volume, low-latency workloads such as automated claims adjudication, prior authorization decisioning, and predictive risk modeling. Without this shift, AI initiatives remain constrained to pilots that cannot scale or deliver sustained ROI.

Equally important is an interoperability platform strategy. Modernized systems built on standardized APIs (most notably FHIR) are essential to meet mandated data exchange requirements and to support seamless connectivity with provider EHRs, partners, and regulatory systems. API-driven interoperability replaces brittle point-to-point integrations with reusable, governed services, enabling faster compliance, cleaner data flows, and greater ecosystem flexibility. In practical terms, this is what allows payers to streamline real-time prior authorization, longitudinal member views, and cross-system AI decisioning.

So, as painful as it might be, legacy IT is incompatible with the operating model payers are being forced into. Cloud-native cores and API-based interoperability are not modernization “projects”—they are the minimum viable architecture for agility, compliance, and AI at scale.

4. Things are going to get personal

The member experience has shifted from back-office convenience to a core strategic differentiator—one that directly influences plan selection, retention, and satisfaction. Members now expect digital experiences on par with consumer tech leaders, and payers that fail to deliver risk increased churn and lower satisfaction scores.

For example, digital app satisfaction among health plan members still lags other industries, with scores around 600–650/1,000, and nearly 40% of members report difficulty finding needed information, driving poor channel reuse and engagement. Here are just a few of the personalization expectations heading into 2026:

Rising digital expectations

Health plan members increasingly use digital channels (like mobile apps and web portals) for core interactions, yet satisfaction scores lag behind other industries. On a 1,000-point scale, commercial plan digital experience averages 653, and Medicare Advantage plans average 597, significantly below wealth management (794) and property/casualty insurers (700). When members can easily find needed information, overall satisfaction jumps by 83 points, yet payers fail to deliver that level of experience 39% of the time.

Mobile adoption and engagement

Usage of payer mobile apps is rising with 37% of commercial members using their insurer’s app in 2025 (up from 31% in 2024). However, poor experiences reduce the likelihood of reuse to just 27%. Members who engage via apps report higher satisfaction (636) than those using websites or phone channels (607).

Omnichannel digital front door

Providing a seamless, personalized digital experience across mobile, web, virtual assistants, SMS, and call channels is pretty much a minimum standard at this point. A strong digital front door reduces friction and aligns payer systems with member expectations shaped by consumer tech experiences. Payers that optimize digital usability can improve engagement and retention, while those that don’t risk dissatisfaction and churn.

Proactive, predictive engagement

Payers investing in predictive analytics and leveraging data from wearables are positioned to shift from reactive service to proactive care. Nearly 73% of health insurance executives report that wearable and remote monitoring data has increased member engagement and personalization, enabling outreach and interventions before adverse health events occur.

Impact on loyalty and retention

Strong digital experiences correlate with loyalty—members of plans with high digital satisfaction are significantly more likely to renew coverage. In Medicare Advantage, 85% of members with high digital satisfaction scores say they will “definitely renew,” more than double the loyalty of those with poor experiences.

5. It’s time to strengthen the data

Risk stratification and population health management are undergoing a material upgrade as payers incorporate Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) into their analytics and care models. Clinical and claims data alone no longer provide sufficient insight into member risk or future cost drivers. Social and economic factors (such as housing stability, food access, and transportation) are now widely recognized as primary contributors to health outcomes and utilization patterns, particularly in managed care populations.

Integrating SDOH data alongside traditional data sources enables payers to move from retrospective analysis to forward-looking risk intelligence. Research consistently shows that social and economic factors account for 30–55% of health outcomes, far outweighing the influence of medical care alone. Without this data, risk models systematically underestimate vulnerability, leading to inefficient interventions, higher avoidable utilization, and weaker performance in value-based arrangements.

Related Article: 3 Phases to Better Payer Quoting

Key capabilities unlocked by SDOH integration include:

Comprehensive risk profiles: Combining non-clinical SDOH data with claims and clinical records creates a holistic view of member risk, improving predictive accuracy for ED visits, readmissions, and chronic condition escalation.
Improved population stratification: Enhanced models better identify high-risk and rising-risk members who would otherwise be invisible using claims-only approaches.
Targeted, non-medical interventions: Data-driven programs addressing barriers such as transportation, nutrition, and housing have been shown to reduce missed appointments by up to 30% and lower avoidable hospitalizations for chronic and diet-related conditions.
Stronger managed care performance: Medicare Advantage and Medicaid populations carry a disproportionate SDOH burden; integrating this data improves care management effectiveness, HEDIS performance, and total cost of care outcomes.
Alignment with value-based care: SDOH-informed insights support quality measure improvement, equity initiatives, and contract performance under risk-based models.

In short, SDOH integration transforms population health from a clinically reactive model into a holistic, intervention-driven strategy. For payers operating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other value-based environments, embedding SDOH data into core analytics and workflows will become a prerequisite for improving outcomes, managing cost, and competing effectively.

‍

6. A continued push for value-based care

Payers are actively using advanced technology to transform their operating model from traditional fee‑for‑service (volume‑based) reimbursement to value‑based care (VBC) that rewards outcomes and quality. This strategic shift is supported by predictive analytics, AI, and shared data platforms that drive actionable insights, align incentives, and improve performance measurement across payers and providers. The proportion of payments flowing through alternative payment models (APMs) with value components has been steadily increasing, demonstrating real momentum toward outcome‑oriented reimbursement.

Payers and providers overwhelmingly agree on the importance of this transition and are investing in joint infrastructure. However, execution gaps still exist, particularly around data governance and system integration. In one industry report, 98% of payer and provider leaders said AI and advanced analytics are essential to VBC success, yet fewer than half report full organizational commitment to scaling these technologies.

Predictive cost management: Advanced analytics forecast care trajectories and identify high-risk members, enabling interventions that reduce avoidable utilization and align with VBC targets.
Shared data platforms: Integrated payer-provider platforms allow real-time data sharing, joint risk modeling, and transparent performance tracking to align incentives and improve outcomes.
Stakeholder alignment: Unified platforms support collaboration, quality improvement, and trust-building in VBC arrangements, enabling growth in value-based contracts.

By combining predictive analytics with shared data infrastructure, payers can move from reactive claims processing to proactive care management, driving financial and clinical outcomes while solidifying partnerships with providers.

If you want to get ahead of these 6 digital transformation trends for payers in 2026, reach out to our experts at TELUS Digital today to learn more.

‍

Blog